View Single Post
Old 07-08-2008, 12:26 PM   #6
scaeagles
I LIKE!
 
scaeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
scaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of cool
I'm not exactly sure what i think about this. I am big into private property rights.

If it were the opposite, and the law was that conceal carry in a car was specifically disallowed by law, Disney would have no legal authority to say that employees of theirs were allowed to do so.

However, even though free speech is a specific constitutional right, it is reasonable to suggest that Disney employees can't tell guests that Universal is a better deal and more fun and could be fired for doing so.

In AZ, there are many public smoking bans, and private property owners are not allowed to simply exclude themselves because they wish to allow smoking.

I can see both sides, but i would figure Disney is in the wrong.
scaeagles is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote