View Single Post
Old 08-19-2008, 07:59 PM   #82
Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Sputnik Sweetheart
 
Eliza Hodgkins 1812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 2,685
Eliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of coolEliza Hodgkins 1812 is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Most of my spelling and grammar offenses are a result of self-correcting as I reread my writing before others see it. Spelling and "by-the-book" grammar are not my strong points, I admit. That doesn't, however, mean I love words, sentences, paragraphs, writing or reading any less than someone who also values those things and has perfected their punctuation marks and A, B, Cs. If I write something here and quickly review, I don't often ferret out the mistakes. If I wrote "your" where I meant to write "you're", I will read "you're", so won't know to correct myself. And I most certainly know the difference between the two even if I continue to make that mistake.

When I allow myself the time, my writing usually proceeds as follows:

Round 1: Self-expressoin with stream of consciousness embelishments.
Round 2: Review and rewrite, to improve the narrative, refine my opinions, etc. At this point, I'm still auto-correcting. I rarely catch the spelling and grammar snafus.
Round 3: Review, and more rewrites. At this point, it becomes clear that I need to proofread.
Round 4: I read one word at a time to identify and correct spelling errors.
Round 5: I read one sentence at a time to correct grammar mistakes and any additional spelling mistakes (such as "its" and "it's").
Round 6: I take a break from editing. I don't look at the piece for hours or a day or more.
Round 7: I read the piece again as a whole, once again to make sure I'm pleased with its entirety, and if I make any significant changes that require additional proofreading, I begin the process all over again.

By round 7, after a great deal of work, I usually have something that boasts faultless spelling and grammar. And I continue to argue that commas are a matter of personal preference. I use them when I feel like using them.

When posting on the LoT or sending emails to co-workers, I usually make it through Round 1, maybe Round 2. Call it laziness. Call it "not enough hours in the day". I may embarrass myself from time to time, but usually my meaning comes across. I was once consoled by a wise mate who (and here I poorly paraphrase) said original and good creative writing is hard to come by, but precise spelling and grammar can be learned or corrected by a helpful editor. I'd rather be skilled at both, but que sera...

Doesn't mean I don't envy those who are clearly able to express themselves beautifully with nearly flawless execution. (I'm looking at you, LSPE, Tom, NM, Alex, ism, etc., etc., etc.)
Eliza Hodgkins 1812 is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote