|
Let me be clear ... it was the film's JFK facts that I found 99% accurate (according to my limited research which may not have even included the book Alex says is vital) ... not the Clay Shaw facts. I have zero idea if those are true, and I have zero problem if the movie is presented entirely from Garrison's point of view.
I also have no problem with Garrison's story being dramatized. Yeah, he didn't present the Zabruder film in court. But, as the District Attorney, neither did he even present the case. That would have made for a rather boring conclusion to the film, eh? So, yeah, his story dramatized per movie bio conventions. The JFK stuff presented, to my satisfaction, with remarkable accuracy.
And, frankly, if Alex doesn't see a conspiracy with his own eyes by watching the Zabruder film, I see no reason to read a book he claims as vital on the subject. I don't mean to get personal, Alex. But we are clearly living in two different worlds. There's nothing wrong with yours.
|