View Single Post
Old 04-20-2005, 06:04 PM   #8
Prudence
Beelzeboobs, Esq.
 
Prudence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gavel - I haz it
Posts: 6,287
Prudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of coolPrudence is the epitome of cool
Send a message via MSN to Prudence Send a message via Yahoo to Prudence
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevy Baby
I would love to see their rationalization on this one. While I by not means support Wal Mart, claims like this do an injustice to the fight. If they are using the government aid issue, they base their assumption that every single Wal Mart employee IS on government assistance and it is solely Wal Mart's fault.
We had a minor kerfluffle up here with WalMart. The argument was that WalMart restricted the number of employees eligible for benefits by mostly hiring part time employees. (And not because no one wanted to work full time.) This allowed WalMart to offer its customers lower prices than competitors, who provide benefits to a larger percentage of their employees. The hidden costs come from taxpayers, who support the state's Basic Health insurance program (not to mention Medicaid) for people who don't have employer-provided health insurance and can't afford private coverage.
__________________
traguna macoities tracorum satis de
Prudence is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote