Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenigma
OK I misunderstood a tidbit about Palin's email hack yesterday because I assumed the hack was performed "anonymously."
This is actually not accurate. The hack was performed by "Anonymous," the amorphous group that has also waged a harassment campaign against the Church of Scientology.
That to me says a lot. This is activist-motivated. Instead of just some haxxor in Russia tinkering around and gleefully reading Sarah Palin's private email, this was done as an act of defiance to make a point--I *suspect* it was to say that government officials should not hide their backroom dealings under the veil of personal email.
Can we say....
 ???? |
The trouble with amorphous groups like Anonymous or Al Qaeda is that just about anyone can do just about anything and say "Yup. We are members of <** insert group name here **>" and there is really no way, even for other members of the group, to categorical say yes or no to their involvment. .
From what little I have seen this could just as easily be some Thetan looking to give Anon a black eye.