Thread: Yes, we can.
View Single Post
Old 10-14-2008, 07:10 AM   #9
scaeagles
I LIKE!
 
scaeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
scaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of cool
Fair question, Moonliner, and it has no simple or quick answer. I will when I have more time (as in not at work).

ISM, here's a news flash for you. For the tax year 2006....

Top 1% of wage earners (above $388,000) paid 39.89% of all federal income taxes.

Top 5% of wage earners (aggregate with the 1%, above $153,000) paid 60.14% of all federal income taxes.

The top 10% paid 70.79%, the top 25% paid 86.27%. The bottom 50% paid 2.99%.

Being that this is the case, how can it be said that the top wage earners are not paying enough, or that the taxes from the middle class has been a redistribution of wealth from the middle to the rich?
scaeagles is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote