I listened to it several times.
The first - of course it was a moral lapse. No doubt. However, it does not "still continue until this day".
Secondly, he says that the Warren court did not break free from the essential constraints of the Constitution. The whole context is about what he terms "economic justice" and redistribution of wealth. I have listened to it 5 or 6 times to be absolutely clear.
He then continues on to say that it was a tragedy in the civil rights movement not to focus more on "redistributive change".
When the caller asks if it is too late to be repaired, he says he isn't optimistic such change can be brought through the courts. He clearly WANTS redistribution of wealth.
I do not believe I am a liar or a dupe. He says exactly that he wants redistribution of wealth.
|