|
Don't know nearly enough of the law here.
The argument challenging Proposition 8 is that it was is actually a significant revision of the constitution and not merely an amendment, right? If this argument loses, Prop 8 becomes part of the constitution.
Wouldn't a new ballot proposition reversing prop 8 then much more clearly fall into trouble for being a significant revision (explicitly reversing what it says seems significant to me) to the constitution? Therefore, just to be safe, shouldn't there be an effort to get the state legislature to do their necessary part before getting an anti-Prop 8 prop on the ballot in 2010?
|