Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonliner
We've gone around a bit, can you refresh me on what "the subject" is?
Are you arguing for the right to post a stupid sign or in support of the silly message on the stupid sign?
|
Do you honestly expect me to answer such a fallaciously based question?
By declaring the sign and/or its message as "stupid" is patently subjective, not to mention fallacious.
Just because you disagree with the statement (and ascribed the ubsubstantiated label of "stupid") does not invalidate the statement.
Notwithstanding, the "bottom line" is those who disbelieve in religion have THE SAME RIGHT as those who do believe in religion to their expression, whether publicly or privately.
This issue is a matter of public display, obviously...and under the 1st Amendment non-religious people have the same freedom/equal access to the Capitol of Washington as religious people do.
However, religious people are claiming the 'special pleading fallacy' in that they, and only they, have such a right; and non-religious people DO NOT have this right.
That, in and of itself, is not only immoral and flies in the face of common sense; it is patently unconstitutional (not to mention hypocritical).
That "is the subject" of this thread.
S.D.