12-05-2008, 08:30 PM
|
#119
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Dillon
To defend a religious display simultaneoulsye disagreeing with a non-religious display on public grounds, both having the same 1st Amendment rights of that display, is inherently just that...ironic/hypocritical.
|
I'm not sure I defend public religious displays either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Dillon
Notwithstanding this fact, there is more empirical evidence supporting the former (making it a substantiated opinion) than the latter (an UNsubstantaited opinion)!
|
One can't prove a negative, only fail to prove a positive. So I disagree that there is evidence for the nonexistance of god. One can think of god as unnecessary, possibly, but non-existance cannot actually be proven.
People believe things. Some believe in god, of various forms, and some believe in a lack of god. Both are opinions.
__________________
Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at.
-Lance Armstrong
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|