Sir Dillon, in response to "We're just questioning the merits of that particular sign," you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Dillon
Which is akin to questioning its legal right to be presented on public property!!
|
Okay, questioning the merits of a sign's content is akin to questioning its legal right to be presented on public property? Am I missing something here? Those are very clearly two different things.
1) - I support the legal right for the sign to be displayed.
2) - I don't think the message as written is as effective as it could be.
Where does the second one in any way negate the first? You say they are akin and add two exclamation points.
Heck, theoretically, I could go further and say
1) - I support the legal right for the sign to be displayed
2) - I completely disagree with the message and think it is poorly worded to boot.
And there is still no contradiction. Nor does the second negate the first. Nor are they akin.
What's the deal?