|
Actually, I still found it very thought provoking at several points. Unfortunately, if you are in that choir, it is repretitive because he takes the arguments in favor of god's existence on individually (because frequently the response to an argument against one god is responded to with "well, mine is different" even when it really isn't) and the response is generally the same with at most minor tweaking.
But it put into succinct form many arguments I've made in the past and presses home the point that many "all things are possible" arguments miss in that while all things may be possible they are not all equally probable. Or that the existence of god just pushes back all of the same questions one layer.
|