| 
	
	
		
		
		
		 I suppose one can debate the costs vs. how many lives are likely to be saved, but I don't see that as nanny government.  It would be nanny government if the government were intervening to alleviate a risk of harm that only happened to 1) adults 2) when they were drunk or stoned. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				 
Live now-pay later.  Diner's Club!
			 
		
		
		
		
	
	 |