Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevy Baby
Yes, there are those who disagree.
|
That's like saying, "Here are some links to people who have evidence that aliens do exist. There are those that disagree..."
It's the ones that claim NO evidence for human-caused/exacerbated climate change that are in disagreement. The
vast majority of the scientific community agrees that there is a preponderance of evidence for the plausibiliy thereof.
There is no evidence that
conclusively proves that humans are the cause of current climate change. I will grant you that, as will any reputable scientist in the field. What there is is, A) Overwhelming evidence that the climate IS changing, and B) Overwhelming theoretical and laboratory evidence that human activities can plausibly contribute to those changes. That the byproducts of our use of resources on this planet strongly correlate to the climate changes that are being observed. Enough to stop and say, "You know, seeing as there's a pretty damn good argument that we ARE at least making things worse, maybe we ought to avoid that, and, you know, not doom ourselves to extinction. Just in case."
Are there people who overstate it, or state it in misleading terms? Yes. But that's not a good enough reason to react with, "It's all bullsh*t."