View Single Post
Old 05-24-2005, 09:20 AM   #29
wendybeth
Nevermind
 
wendybeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,847
wendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of cool
Send a message via Yahoo to wendybeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by scaeagles
How is extra security around the Liberty Bell a loss of civil liberties? We've debated this before, but I don't know anyone who has lost civil liberties. The only thing I can think of which comes close (well, two now) are the Guantanamo detainees (and only if they are US citizens) and a provision proposed in the new Patriot Act taking away judicial oversight on certian warrants (which I oppose).

I just don't see civil liberties being eroded.
You know perfectly well I was referring to such things as the 'Patriot Act' and the indefinite imprisonment of suspects, etc. I suppose as long as it doesn't affect you it's alright? That provision in the Patriot Act allowing the FBI to rifle through your records and not be answerable to anyone is frightening and is a huge blow to our civil liberties. The only reason the Act got passed was because of this climate of fear that the OP wrote about.
__________________









wendybeth is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote