Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Prudence
Is the use of the word "public" the kicker?
And frankly I think it's mostly misdirection. Don't worry about that deficit/social security/homelessness/hunger/education/elder care/etc...
|
That is a good question. I suppose I don't know where the line is. However, I suppose i would be one to suggest that if the government funds something that is optional for use, as in a public library, privacy should not be expected. Something that is mandated, as in going to school, would be more protected. I will firmly admit that I don't know where the line is as far as what is fair game. However, I am sure this is not:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...400746_pf.html
"The FBI on Tuesday asked the U.S. Congress for sweeping new powers to seize business or private records, ranging from medical information to book purchases, to investigate terrorism without first securing approval from a judge."
That is something I cannot support.
Everything the government can do has the potential to be abused. The Patriot Act (original) is no different.
As far as misdirection.....In don't know. Social Security reform is at the forefront of what Bush wants to accomplish this term. We've been waging the "war on poverty" forever, transferring trillions of dollars from the haves to the have nots, and yet there is still poverty and there always will be. Etc, etc, etc.