View Single Post
Old 01-14-2005, 09:35 PM   #36
flippyshark
Senior Member
 
flippyshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,852
flippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of cool
Well, for what it's worth, I'm a heterosexual guy (in my late thirties), and I liked the ALW Phantom on stage, quite a bit, really. Now, the movie? I'm really torn, because there are things I liked about it, and I generally want to be a booster for musical films. But there are some staggering missteps in this movie.

Exxagerated and hyper-real, it used its stylistic choices as an excuse for bad plotting and staging. (One horrid example - during one of the best songs, "Past the Point of No Return," the main characters are completely upstaged by clusters of black-clad dancers gyrating around in what looks like bad wanna-be Martha Graham style. And what was with the "Vogue" posturing during the Masquerade?!?)

So, the movie wants to have it both ways - to be a tear jerking romantic classic, and a highly stylized fanastmagoria. But it's too silly for the former, and not nearly delirious enough for the latter. Alan Parker might have made good on a more straight-forward version, and Ken Russell would have been the man to bring us an energetically lysergic take.

I will probably enjoy having this on video as an imperfect but serviceable record of the play, but as cinema, I doubt it will win many people over.

(I sure hope that Les Mis is made into a much better film than this, if it ever gets made at all.)

Last edited by flippyshark : 01-14-2005 at 09:45 PM.
flippyshark is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote