View Single Post
Old 05-30-2009, 02:55 PM   #22
keith - SuPeR K!
Community Fruit
 
keith - SuPeR K!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 547
keith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of coolkeith - SuPeR K! is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to keith - SuPeR K!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevy Baby View Post
I've noticed that the traffic on Google Maps tends to be about 20-30 minutes behind "real-time." When trying to get accurate traffic info, that is an eternity!
Google Maps gets its traffic data from the DOTs and Caltrans... It's only as updated as the traffic info they receive. I agree that it sucks, but until the DOTs and Caltrans give them updates quicker we'll be stuck with late traffic info. After some research it appears sites like Traffic.com have some ground vehicles and other means of obtaining data which helps them stay more ahead of the curve. Traffic.com also includes individual incidents that may affect traffic making their coverage much more comprehensive.

Also important to note: This team of developers left the Google Maps project after launch to start working on Wave. It's likely they didn't participate in the traffic integration.
__________________
I would hike 10+ hours... and I would hike 10+ more!

Last edited by keith - SuPeR K! : 05-30-2009 at 03:14 PM.
keith - SuPeR K! is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote