View Single Post
Old 09-28-2009, 06:16 PM   #5221
bewitched
101% Yummy!
 
bewitched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: I know Kung Fu.
Posts: 1,413
bewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of coolbewitched is the epitome of cool
Send a message via Yahoo to bewitched
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarTopDancer View Post
If they launch against Israel (which I think is more likely then launching against us, though I'm more worried about them launching against us) wouldn't they still be risking their very existence based upon our relationship with Israel?

If it were anything other than a nuke I'd say that they would have a lot to fear from us. Israel is more than capable of responding in kind to a nuke attack and I think it is far more likely that we would let Israel suffer the world-wide consequences of using a nuke (even in defense) than to go anywhere near that particular tar baby.

There have been rumors around for quite some time (especially under Bush) that if there was "proof" of Iran making nuclear weapons, Israel would have our tacit (and very secret) approval to bomb the **** out of the production sites. The US has always denied this. Personally, I think it is highly unlikely that the Obama administration is on board with this since they seem to be much more amenable to the carrot over the stick approach.

On another note, I think that sheer tactical barriers (such as transporting a nuke past satellite surveillance to get it to a ship) bar the US from being a realistic target anytime in the foreseeable future.
__________________
~Whitney

Wondering about the future of Ellington Woodard's punk@ss sh!t.


bewitched is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote