I still don't get it. They are both actual, possible outcomes of the stated behavior. If he really was eating fish twice daily for that long, mercury poisoning is definitely possible, even likely. And it's been shown that the estrogen from as little as 2 glasses of soy milk/day can have an effect on a woman's menstrual cycle, so I'd imagine that 6x that amount would carry the potential for some pretty drastic results (such as gynecomastia).
I just don't get the instant hostility towards the claim? What exactly did he do to SM that he so desperately wants to discredit him?
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ
|