No, it'd be an extremely discursive act. What does it say about art if an object ceases to be art simply because the person who created it waves a contract in the air and says "poof! that is no longer ze art!"
By pooping on the party I'd actually be fulfilling to the logical extension the abstractness of what is art. One might even argue that by being unlabeled as art it would in fact become even artier, thus causing the universe to implode.
ETA: I know I did not use the word discursive correctly. It is an inside joke that I realize after the fact that only I will get.
|