Argue the dynamics all you want, the end result is the same...corporations having a cripling advantage over unions in the political arena. It's just another symptom of Arnold's definition of Unions as "special interest groups" and corporations as "impartial supporters". It's disgusting how blatantly two-faced he is about that.
We might as well vote for tax reform that removes all tax shelters and deductions and implements a flat tax, but only for people who make under $150,000 a year. Sure, the general principal may be good (I stress "may", I'm not trying to argue merits of any tax reform proposal, just setting up a hypothetical), but the application to only one segment is ridiculous.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ
|