I more or less agree with iSm. With the slight caveat that Pixar direct-to-video quality is still leaps and bounds better than most studios' major-motion-picture quality. It's a good movie, maybe even an excellent movie, and worth seeing, but I've never understood why it seems to be more highly regarded than the first (though I've long suspected it comes down to the fact that the humans in it aren't as creepy as they are in the first).
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ
|