Quote:
Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
How is this a new plothole? I thought we solved a slew of plotholes by positing that dreamers needn't be present in all scenes of their own dreams.
|
It's not. My point was just that if there is an assumption that the dreamer must be present for what is dreamed then it just shifts the plothole from explaining why Cobb isn't in each scene to explaining why someone (or a desginated gruop of someone's) isn't in each scene.
If you don't assume the dreamer has to be physically present then there is no issue.