View Single Post
Old 08-01-2010, 03:07 PM   #3
flippyshark
Senior Member
 
flippyshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,852
flippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of coolflippyshark is the epitome of cool
Yes, I think the driving goal is to get that other 5%. (If that other 5% can be understood as not supporting candidates who oppose gay marriage - I don't really know how percentages can be figured on such things) It doesn't strike me as unreasonable to want Target to avoid supporting candidates as outspokenly anti-gay as Emmer. (As opposed to, say, asking Target to be completely politically progressive. Demanding ideological purity would indeed be stupid, and I don't think anyone proposing a boycott is asking for that.)

I'm not feeling any outrage - more of an eye-rolling sense of "Well, of course they aren't as cool as I was hoping. *sigh*"

Actually, I hadn't considered the negative attention to Emmer angle, but, yeah, I'm totally on board with that!

Edited to add - Yes, getting better from the other less enlightened companies would be a really good goal too.

Last edited by flippyshark : 08-01-2010 at 03:13 PM.
flippyshark is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote