View Single Post
Old 08-04-2010, 04:10 PM   #65
scaeagles
I LIKE!
 
scaeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
scaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
But when it comes to direct campaign support or candidate/ballot initiative advocacy I think all contribution should be directly given by human individuals.
I suppose my thinking is just in line with supreme court rulings, but what is a special interest group besides a collection of people coming together seeking a common purpose? I don't see the difference between a single individual and a group of people combining their money into one pool for an interest or concern to be managed at a higher level.

However, you list a group that I see completely differently. Money I may give to the NRA or invest in stock or spend at Target is my choice. Union dues to the Teamsters are compulsory. I suppose the argument could be made that individuals could quit their jobs just the same as they can choose not to shop at Target, and while I would disagree, I don't think I could voice my disagreement logically except to say that there is a right to work (of which the definition varies from state to state).
scaeagles is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote