|
I'll be interested to see how this goes. I know next to nothing about him, so I'm not qualified at this point to offer an opinion.
An AP article does note that as an attorney he argued both sides of many issues -- affirmative action, antitrust, etc... In general, that's the sort of experience that would demonstrate an ability to examine all sides of a case.
In contrast, I'm not sure I would be supportive of a nominee who had a record of only taking one side in practice, as I would be suspicious of the dreaded "agenda."
__________________
traguna macoities tracorum satis de
|