|
Sure, there are many reasons why in reality it wouldn't be a practical plan. But it did start with the assumption that somehow I'm in charge of Disneyland so it isn't like it started out reality based and then went off track.
But my larger view is that there should be no permanent attractions at Disneyland. Change should be the norm and if they won't actually rip out and replace attractions then constantly modifying the ones that are there, even if much of the time the changes don't work is, to me, preferable to stasis for even the most cherished of attractions.
Nostalgia is boring when the thing one is nostalgic for never went away (and likely never will).
|