Thread: The Gay Thread
View Single Post
Old 05-03-2011, 10:12 AM   #1078
SzczerbiakManiac
"ZER-bee-ak"
 
SzczerbiakManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,409
SzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of coolSzczerbiakManiac is the epitome of cool
I've brought this discussion here because it seems more appropriate here than in the Bin Laden thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonliner View Post
just for the record, I read "breeders" the same way you read "faggots"
I think that's a status you assigned to it unfairly. There is no historical basis for that equivalency.
  • Homosexuals have not gone out at night in packs for decades (centuries?) with specific intention of finding a heterosexual to kill because they find their "lifestyle" disgusting and call them breeders while doing so.
  • Cars full of drunk homosexuals don't ride past a heterosexual couple holding hands on the street and throw bottles at them while shouting "breeder".
  • Homosexual juries don't convict heterosexuals of "crimes against nature" and quietly mutter "breeder" under their breath as they pass sentence.
  • Heterosexual bar patrons have never been arrested for opposite-sex dancing, protested in the form of a riot, and had those activities reported in the newspaper the next day as an "outbreak of breedery".
The word "breeder" implies no more inherent malice than does "woman".

"I met a woman at the store."
vs.
"Crap, I'm stuck behind a woman driver."

Context & intent are everything.
__________________
SzczerbiakManiac is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote