|
I know why they did it. But I'm still curious about the actual wording. It it's, "No religious service may spill out of its designated building in such a way that it disrupts free use of public rights of way" then I have little problem with it. If it's "No mosque service may spill out of its designate building in such a way blah blah blah," I begin to have a problem with it. If it's, "No personal displays of religious prayer may be done on public streets," I begin to have a large problem with it and would seriously wonder about equity in enforcement. if it's, "No Muslim may pray in public," I have a humungous problem with it.
The wording matters.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ
|