|
I'm not a fan of the roman numeral look to begin with, and I pretty much end up with numberless faces as well. So no, I had not noticed.
And, iSm, as the various explanations point out, there's a ton of historical precedent for using IIII instead of IV, it's hardly "incorrect".
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ
|