Quote:
|
Originally Posted by flippyshark
There's a long story here that I'll tell some other time, but as a kid, I always thought the Star Child was huge, and he looked kind of pissed. I thought he was coming back to destroy the earth, and I found him the most terrifying image I had ever seen on a movie screen.
Since he's really pretty much symbolic, the question of whether or not he's baby-sized is pretty academic.
|
If the Starchild was really depicted in proper scale, then his diaper would be the size of the Pacific Ocean.
This in turn would mean that his bare baby bottom would be roughly the size of the moon.
Which is what we are actually seeing every month, as the Starchild completes another revolution.
He's mooning us, the bastard.
Which proves that the moon landing was faked on a soundstage, and the earth is flat.
Thank you.
(Hey, I bet if Karl Rove told this to George, he'd buy it...)