Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scaeagles
If you are referring to my post, I clearly said that much of the criticism is warranted. I just find it funny that Bush keeping his distance - when criticized for not keeping his distance in the 9/11 disaster - is ridiculous.
Would you be critical if he didn't view the damage? (See! He doesn't care enough to even look at it!) Would you be critical if he took a huge security entourage to the area so he could view it up close (all the money he spent to come view it just to look good could have gone to the relief efforts! He's just getting in the way so he can look good!)
Criticize the progress thus far. Criticize the stupid statements of Hastert and the FEMA guy and the homeland security guy. Be critical of a lack of a plan when it has literally been discussed for 50 years that a big hurricane could do this the NO. But the "uncaring" comments, to me, are ridiculous.
|
No, but thanks for making my point. You seem to think I'm
looking for an opportunity to criticize, you create scenarios and responses I might have, and, because you ignored my original question (why is criticism political?), you seem to imply that, in fact, I
am making a mindless political criticism of the situation. Again, thanks.
I've heard, and read, many people other than you, including the President and his spokesmen, decry simple criticism as politicizing.
At what point did I say anyone was "uncaring?"
It was clear 3 days ago that officials with bullhorns should have been out communicating with the victims. At the same time, the President should have landed his ass in Louisiana in a helicopter. The mayor of New Orleans has been left hanging out to dry. We should be getting hourly updates from whatever is left of FEMA on the progress in New Orleans.
Leadership has failed from the top down. Communication has failed from the top down.
I AM SO ANGRY.