|
The precedent still exists, but it simply exists for people who have the legal standing to sue on such grounds. Just becuase the dude didn't have standing, doesn't mean that the ruling never existed. It applies to anyone who does have standing.
The Supreme Court had to know it was just side-stepping the issue and that it would come up again. Well, here it is.
Oh, don't expect to hear anything about Roberts's take on it. He won't even reveal his shoe size.
|