View Single Post
Old 09-14-2005, 02:38 PM   #2
Morrigoon
I throw stones at houses
 
Morrigoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 9,534
Morrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of coolMorrigoon is the epitome of cool
Well, how about Jehovah's witnesses? How about people who are so die-hard for their religion, whatever it is, that in their own judgement it would be a violation of their beliefs to do so?

The point I'm making is, there are two sides to this. While saying "under God" may be seen as pushing a religious agenda, removing it may be seen as pushing an atheist agenda. If atheism is going to get the same treatment as religion for the purposes of being offended, they also ought to be given that status for the purposes of giving offense. By forcing the government to remove "under God", the government is ruling in favor of atheism, which I believe is unconstitutional.

Damn, maybe I should have gone to law school, LOL.
__________________
http://bash.org/?top
"It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge
Morrigoon is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote