Well, I've read a bunch, and I'm willing to accept it as fact - in my reading I found writings stating both sides. I wasn't trying to dispute it, and state that I had read both.
I have also clearly said that if DeLay is guilty, convict him.
However, I think it is perfectly clear, based on Earle's own words in appearances at democratic functions, that he has a political agenda. He is a politician, so of course he does. What I find so amazing is that he says such things in public, but then denies later that there is a political element.
|