View Single Post
Old 10-02-2005, 07:07 PM   #76
Scrooge McSam
What?
 
Scrooge McSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,635
Scrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of coolScrooge McSam is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor
You are working on misinformation about the differences between "female modification" and the Jewish Bris. The female procedure, done by some Islamic cultures, removes the freakin' pleasure centers. The Bris removes a flap of skin unnecessary for sexual pleasure.
Actually, no I'm not.

As to my ill advised rant of yesterday, I wan't even talking about a Bris. I was talking about the radical circumcisions performed in hospitals. Reading back, I understand that I have to take a lot of backlash about that, because I realize I was not NEARLY as specific as I thought I was being.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor
I've witnessed many a Bris. The rabbi (who also always a certified MD) uses a scalpel. No pulling or ripping involved. The exterior flap is removed. And the baby is given a small amount of wine on a cloth to suck on.
And you're right. The Bris has almost none of the characteristics of the surgery I'm talking about. I don't doubt what you've seen, nor do I doubt your ability to comment on that authoritatively. Please afford me that same courtesy.

I'm willing to bet that you have NOT seen a radical hospital circumcision performed. A radical circ is so different from a Bris as to make it difficult to even compare the two. It would be somewhat akin to comparing cutting your fingernail to having your fingernail pulled out by the root. GD has a post upthread making note of the difference in the 2 procedures.

A Bris involves removing the tip end of the prepuce that extends past the end of the glans. The glans is uninjuired in this procedure if done correctly. Yes, there is damage to the body, but not on a scale even approaching the damage caused by a radical circ. A radical circ involves slicing the foreskin lengthwise and tearing it away from the surface of the glans, literally skinning the glans alive.

Radical circumcision as performed in hospitals is very similar to female genital modification. 75% of the erogenous tissue of the penis is removed during a radical circumcision. The same is not true of a Bris.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor
Scrooge, I love ya, please don't insult me.
CP, I want to thank you for addressing this in thread. It's been brought to my attention how my post was received and I appreciate the opportunity to set this right. Editting the original post seemed dishonest, so I'm happy to clear up any misunderstanding this way. I hope this post has done that.
Scrooge McSam is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote