|
I am unaware of how any can review several years worth of records and be completely prepared for anything and everything he might be asked, but that's OK.
Go ahead and call my post spin. Right now everything in the media is unsubstantiated spin based on information that is not known. Except by ISM apparently. I will reserve my judgement of any "technicality" until after I see what, if any, charges are brought forth. I simply said it would be ludicrous for the charges to be limited to obstruction or perjury on something such as an unremembered phone call. I wonder how many times "C" said he couldn't remember something in his grand jury testimony.
And you have read the grand jury testimony? Or are they reports from the same media that keeps telling us that the indictments were to be handed down Wednesday? Interesting....I thought grand jury information was secretive. I'm glad you know what was testified to and how many times it has been changed.
And if Fitzgerald does not hand down the indictments as you would like to see, I hope you still have the same opinion of the man. I know nothing of him.
|