Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
Anctient history? That happened at the exact same time as the events in the original article.
|
I'm being sarcastic here, GD. Of course it isn't ancient history. Of course it is relevant. I just grow tired of posters telling me that things I think are relevant to current events that involve the previous administration - handling of terrorism, handling of Iraq, whatever - are irrelevant. It is annoying when posters tell me that making a comparison between one non-profit and another non-profit that are both supposed to be non-political is irrelevant because one is religious and another is not.
If "you" find it to be "irrelevant", then don't comment on it and elevate the status of said comment into a position of prominence - especially when the comment was a short off-hand remark. Perhaps explaining why you don't think it applies would be better.
Yes, what GD posted was about non-profit churches and if the laws are being applied equitably. I didn't think it out of line to suggest that this problem exists outside the religious community as well, especially when it was not being used as any form of an excuse as to why churches should be permitted to violate the law. In fact, I clearly stated that direct endorsement of candidates is absolutely wrong.