Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex Stroup
It offers up not predictions about the world around us, it explains nothing (insofar as "it is unknowable" is not an explanation) and as preferred by most proponents, it requires an actor that exists outside the physical laws of the universe and therefore to enter it into scientific discussion would render all science meaningless because one of the fundamental axioms of scientific exploration is that the laws of the universe are constant across the universe and time (not that they haven't changed, but that when they have it is do to other purely physical forces).
|
Longest sentence ever. Just kidding. (I won't insert a smilie here, I know how much you hate them.)
I agree totally with you, Alex. Damn you eloquent people. (wink smilie)
It does sound like the Intelligent Design answer to every science question would be 'God made it so that's why'. And that just isn't good enough for me.