Thread: Robert Blake not guilty, but he is liable
View Single Post
Old 11-18-2005, 04:10 PM   #4
Ghoulish Delight
I Floop the Pig
 
Ghoulish Delight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alternative Swankstyle
Posts: 19,348
Ghoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to Ghoulish Delight Send a message via Yahoo to Ghoulish Delight
Quote:
Originally Posted by scaeagles
I've never really understood the logic, though I understand the legality of it, of someone who is found not guilty of a crime being ifinancially liable for the results of the crime. Not that I shed a tear for either OJ or Blake, but it just seems odd to me.
Yeah, kind of a dirty way to get around double jeopardy, imo.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ
Ghoulish Delight is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote