Quote:
|
Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
How can I fault Disney for going with the safest, common demonimator standards of beauty for something as common-denominator-pleasing as Disneyland? With thousands of cast members, there's bound to be an interesting range of looks no matter what beauty standards they apply. And whatever they do with the costume designs and sizes, I believe they - like many employers - will continue to hire the most beautiful, qualified people available.
|
Sorry - missed this the first time but:
Disney is not doing this now (at least using scale and ruler to determine beauty) your argument that they were in their rights to do so in 1955, implies you feel the current practice wrong - i.e. not using a "standard" for determining atractiveness/hirability. From what I understand they are hiring a diverse workfroce which ultimately satisfies more than just the common denominator of beauty - do you think this wrong?