Quote:
|
Originally Posted by €uroMeinke
Sorry - missed this the first time but:
Disney is not doing this now (at least using scale and ruler to determine beauty) your argument that they were in their rights to do so in 1955, implies you feel the current practice wrong - i.e. not using a "standard" for determining atractiveness/hirability. From what I understand they are hiring a diverse workfroce which ultimately satisfies more than just the common denominator of beauty - do you think this wrong?
|
The reality is that, Disney is desperate for good people to work at the Parks. They are sadly understaffed and overworking the staff they do have. I think hiring people to fit some wierd outdated standard of something as subjective as "Beauty" is the least of their worries. Bring on the fat, the ackward, the ugly, the ethnic, the odd looking - just make sure they can work and word effectively.
And, if the current CM's don't meet your oogling standards then go to hooters or rent some porn. There are lots of options of simple base eye candy in the world.