Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scaeagles
If he turns what should be a non-political event (the Oscars) into an opportunity to spout political rhetoric, then boo him.
|
However, the rules for the Oscars states that winners of the award can make political statements during their acceptance speech. The presenters are not allowed to do that. So, it is commonplace for political sentiment to be expressed on the Oscars.
So what does one do with the Univ of Conn crowd? Come out beforehand and say, 'No booing or else?' You can't do that...
Furthermore, I was thinking just now (as I was walking Frodo in the snow) why can't Coulter take the high road when she speaks? Why is her rhetoric all about accusations and hateful name calling? Maybe that's her thing but if that's all it is, then it's very easy to tune out.
Example, I watched the Daily Show the other day and the guest was President Jimmy Carter. He spoke very eloquently and pleasantly and yet had a lot of points to present about problems he perceives in the Bush II Administration. He did it in a way that was not demeaning or mean. Yes, he was there to push his new book, but the way a message is conveyed is just as important as the message itself.
Another example, I can listen to John McCain without tuning him out because the guy knows how to speak. He knows how to be civil about things.
Another example, although I think the man makes a lot of good points, sometimes I cringe when I hear Michael Moore speak or read the things he writes. It's too extreme at times and downright hateful at other times. AND he lost a farting match to Peter Griffin.
I guess my point is is that all of this yelling, name-calling, smug Crossfire type of communication that has sprung up post-9/11 has to stop. That goes for both sides.