Quote:
Originally Posted by Prudence
What an astoundingly insulting thing for you to say. Did I ever state that I was in phone contact -- or any kind of contact -- with "known terrorists"?
The question I asked was if I should be monitored because someone with whom I have spoken on a professional basis in the past is now detained. You responded with an implication that I would intentionally remain in contact with "known terrorists".
|
My suggestion - learn how to read. I said that yes,
IF you are in contact with known terrorists, you should be under surveillance.
Alex said it better than I could.
Do you seriously think I was suggesting that you were in contact with known terrorists?
