View Single Post
Old 01-06-2006, 01:53 PM   #5
DisneyFan25863
Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 
DisneyFan25863's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stevenson Ranch, CA
Posts: 464
DisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digsDisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digsDisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digsDisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digsDisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digsDisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digsDisneyFan25863 has the riff everyone digs
Send a message via AIM to DisneyFan25863 Send a message via Yahoo to DisneyFan25863
Quote:
Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Frankly, neither format is going to be offering the kind of improvement over DVD that Joe Blow will roll over for. Perhaps it would have been better to wait the few years till all analog signals disappear from the consumer realm. HDTV will have near universal penetration by then (or by 2 weeks after the analog cut-off) ... and perhaps a format that offers a slightly better picture quality might have a chance at that point.

That's still a big perhaps.


As for more room for extras - - well I've already got 96 hours of running commentary on my Lord of the Rings DVDs plus 544 hours of documentaries and such. Do I really need the extra "extras" room that a new format would provide?
I think the FCC deadline for digital transmission is July of this year, though cable companies can get an extension if they request it. I know pretty much all of LA is digital already, with analog being transmitted just for the people who don't have a box or CableCARD.

Also, having extra room means that the Lord of the Rings will be able to fit on two DVDs instead of like 50. Which, in turn, results in lower costs, which would hopefully be passed on to you.
DisneyFan25863 is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote