I guess that's one place we differ. I do believe government censorship, particularly and most extremely in cases of political speech, is evil. I believe participating in restriction of political speech, most explicitly in politically oppressive countries, is evil. (This is one reason I laugh at Harry Belefonte, standing next to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, talking about Bush being like a nazi and calling him a terrorist, when if he said that about Venezuela's government as a Venezuelan citizen, he'd be imprisoned. That's a different subject, though.)
Other companies do business in China all the time. I am not in favor of most favored nation status for China, but that's the situation, so they can do business as they wish. However, does building a car there contribute to an oppressvie regime? Does giving them McDonalds (if they are there - I don't know) help keep a communist regime in power? I suppose arguments could be made to that effect, but I would argue that giving oppressed peoples an opportunity to see some western style business and products as they open their economy only makes them want more.
One interesting thing that I read once (and I can't even remember his name, but it was a former Soviet dissident) was regarding the TV show Dallas and Levis jeans being allowed into the USSR. Soviet citizens were fascinated by both and wanted more of the west. He said that introduction of western products and media into their culture really assisted in sparking the end of the USSR as we know it.
|