It's Scalia. What, exactly, were you expecting? That's what he does. Actually, he generally first takes you down the meandering path to demonstrate just how much of an idiot you are if you disagree, and then he concludes with the only two or three sentences that are really important.
It doesn't make me want to invite him to my next holiday soiree, but what would be the point of seating 9 justices if they shared the same viewpoint? Plus, he's entertaining in a curmudgeonly way.
__________________
traguna macoities tracorum satis de
|