View Single Post
Old 02-28-2006, 05:02 PM   #26
innerSpaceman
Kink of Swank
 
innerSpaceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inner Space
Posts: 13,075
innerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to innerSpaceman Send a message via MSN to innerSpaceman Send a message via Yahoo to innerSpaceman
Heheh, an arugment which goes out the window when Tokyo puts the Hudson River architecture Mansion in Fantasyland, where the design makes zero sense.

Also, and more appropriate to this discussion, both American Towers of Terror feature 1920's California architecture. One's simply more boring, less creepy. Both are accurate, but one is more interesting and more appropriately frightening. The exterior of the original looks to have cost a few palty hundred thousand dollars more than the DCA sequel.

Perhaps it's not really the "fault" of the imagineers, but rather the curse of DCA that has resulted in the most boring-looking Tower of Terror being chosen for California. If so, it's hardly surprising that the only Disney park worse than DCA, the Walt Disney Studio Park in France, would select the boring model as their ToT.
innerSpaceman is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote