Quote:
Originally Posted by JWBear
I might add... If the administration is so gung-ho on fighting terrorism, why is Bin Lauden still at large? Why is he not priority #1?
|
I see your REAL point of view by your typo, JW. You see Bin Laden as someone to be Lauded, and thus you have called him "Bin Lauden".
I'm just kidding. I'm bored at work and goofy.
I think it has to do with his relevance on the scene at present. I don't think he's calling the shots anymore. Would we love to have him? Oh yeah. Is it worth spending all of our resources on if we don't believe he is doing anything at present that can cause us more harm? No.